BE THE FIRST TO GET PRODUCT UPDATES
Get notified about new features & special offers......
Every rep in strength training is made up of two distinct phases, and most people only pay attention to one of them. The lifting phase gets the focus, while the lowering phase gets treated as something to get through on the way to the next rep. Understanding the difference between eccentric and concentric muscle contractions, and training both with intent, changes what a rep can do for strength, muscle growth, and control.

Concentric action is the muscle-shortening phase of a movement, where the muscle actively shortens to produce force, such as the upward phase of a squat or the pulling phase of a row.
Eccentric action is the muscle-lengthening phase, where the muscle produces force while it lengthens under load, such as the lowering phase of a squat or the controlled return phase of a biceps curl.
Both are muscle contractions in the physiological sense, because the muscle is generating tension throughout. What separates them is the direction of movement relative to the force being produced. This matters because the two phases place different demands on the muscle, and training them differently produces different outcomes.

Concentric contractions are the shortening, lifting phase of a movement, and the phase most people associate with strength training.
Concentric-focused training is the default in most workout programs, and for good reason. It is the phase most closely tied to the force output that shows up in a lift, a jump, or a sprint.

Eccentric contractions are the lengthening, lowering phase. A muscle can resist more load while lengthening than it can lift while shortening, and eccentric contractions need less neural activation to produce a given force [2].
The trade-off is recovery cost. Forcibly lengthening a muscle under load causes microscopic disruption to muscle fibres, which is why eccentric-focused work produces more soreness and damage, especially when it is unfamiliar. The muscle adapts quickly, so soreness falls with repeated exposure [1]. At moderate doses this is a normal part of training, but eccentric work still needs to be introduced gradually and balanced against total volume.

Eccentric work causes more soreness and muscle damage, and it also builds muscle effectively, so it is easy to assume the damage is the reason. The research does not support that link. In one small study, a group that showed clear damage markers and soreness after an unfamiliar eccentric bout gained the same muscle size and strength as a group that avoided those symptoms through gradual build-up [5]. Damage does not appear to be required for growth.
Timing is the other common misunderstanding. Muscle is not built during either phase of the lift. Muscle protein synthesis rises in the hours after training and had roughly doubled 24 hours later in trained lifters [6]. The set is the stimulus, and recovery is where the adaptation happens.
The case for eccentric training rests on the force it allows you to apply, not on soreness, which is a side effect rather than a goal.
Most training already includes both phases in every rep. Training smarter means manipulating the balance and tempo between them deliberately, rather than treating every rep the same:
This is also where the concentric side of training becomes measurable in a way the eccentric side usually is not. Velocity based training as typically applied tracks the speed of the concentric phase, and how much that speed drops within a set is a well-established indicator of accumulated fatigue [7]. When eccentric-focused work has been added to a program, that gives an objective check on whether concentric intent and overall fatigue are still where they should be.
Most compound lifts train both phases automatically, but a few variations emphasise one phase over the other deliberately.
Building strength and muscle does not require choosing one phase over the other permanently. Most well-built programs, including a standard push pull legs split, train both phases through ordinary compound lifts, with the exercises above added deliberately during specific blocks. Tracking whether that emphasis is landing, through strength testing, a look at how to make a fitness plan progress over time, or a clear system for how to track fitness progress, is what turns phase-specific training from theory into a measurable part of the program.
[1] U. Proske and D. L. Morgan, “Muscle damage from eccentric exercise: mechanism, mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 537, no. 2, pp. 333-345, 2001. PubMed
[2] R. M. Enoka, “Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 2339-2346, 1996. PubMed
[3] M. Roig, K. O’Brien, G. Kirk, R. Murray, P. McKinnon, B. Shadgan, and W. D. Reid, “The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 556-568, 2009. PubMed
[4] H. Alfredson, T. Pietilä, P. Jonsson, and R. Lorentzon, “Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 360-366, 1998. PubMed
[5] K. L. Flann, P. C. LaStayo, D. A. McClain, M. Hazel, and S. L. Lindstedt, “Muscle damage and muscle remodeling: no pain, no gain?” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 214, no. 4, pp. 674-679, 2011. PubMed
[6] J. D. MacDougall, M. J. Gibala, M. A. Tarnopolsky, J. R. MacDonald, S. A. Interisano, and K. E. Yarasheski, “The time course for elevated muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise,” Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 480-486, 1995. PubMed
[7] L. Sánchez-Medina and J. J. González-Badillo, “Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1725-1734, 2011. PubMed
[8] N. van der Horst, D. W. Smits, J. Petersen, E. A. Goedhart, and F. J. Backx, “The preventive effect of the Nordic hamstring exercise on hamstring injuries in amateur soccer players: a randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1316-1323, 2015. PubMed
Monthly performance insights, product updates, and sports science — straight to your inbox.
No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.
No thanks, I'm not interested